data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 @ 20:29:40 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Ansi Compliance in Teradata |
|
From: | | John Hall |
After I sent my last note, I started thinking that interface tools really can't be dependent on ANSI compliance - I remembered that when
I attended the original V2R2 briefing (probably a couple of years ago), the claim was made that the Teradata database was the only database
platform that had met Entry-Level ANSI compliance (I assume that others have since qualified). So it doesn't seem as if there is a
particular reason to be ANSI compliant. Is it just a marketing thing?
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea that NCR has made the effort - but I largely view it as being some really nice extensions to Teradata
SQL. My curiosity is whether ANSI compliance represents more.
John
| |