|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 @ 09:53:41 GMT
<-- Anonymously Posted: Monday, March 28, 2016 04:44 --> Hi All, What is/are the reason(s) why a PK will be implemented as USI instead of UPI? This question was formulated based on the following statement: "Primary keys are implemented as unique secondary indexes for non-temporal tables..." Reference: "Database Design" (Release 14.0); page 296 I think that PK as UPI is better since it will uniformly distribute the rows across all AMPs since PK is always unique by definition. So why use USI for a PK? Thank you in advance for any responses.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
https: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 24 Jul 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||