data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 @ 23:02:41 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Creating tables 50% to 90% of columns as unique primary index |
|
From: | | Victor Sokovin |
| Does a hand-coded Atomic Upsert look a little like Mighty Mouse? P'haps an example would be better. | |
Frank, I think what Robert meant was the proper UPSERT, not a combination of two separate statements, INSERT + UPDATE. NCR had coined the word
'atomic' to emphasize that with UPSERT Teradata needs to make a single pass to perform two actions.
When I heard the word for the first time I thought they were referring to the requirement to specify all PI columns in the WHERE clause but
no.
Victor
| |