|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 @ 23:43:36 GMT
Jon,
Agreed on all these points and thanks for the confirmation. I just scanned the thread again and I think your comments would have been better understood if you had posted them as a reply to the posting by Anomy on Jan 22. The actual sequence of postings was different: Anomy Jan 22 - James - Dieter - Jon. I also still think that James's statement "Statistics do not recognize data skewing" is not correct regardless which meaning of the word "skew" he used. Why? Let's see: if it were in the "TD narrow sense" = "PI distribution skew", then it is _not always_ true as you, Jon, have explained yourself. Not always true means not true when one has to choose between "true" or "false", I suppose. If James used "skew" in the general mathematical sense, then his statement would never be true, period. Dieter's remark, on the other hand, was true in the general sense and I cannot see anything in it that would suggest that he had any popular misconceptions that you mention. Hence my posting. It would be interesting if the Anomy who published his/her comments on Jan 22 could actually provide more information about his/her query so that we can see why he/she was expecting the stats to be connected with the data distribution across AMPs. That would give more body to the thread. Once again, thank you for your comments. Victor
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||