Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 @ 14:39:18 GMT
| Subj: | | Priority Scheduler and Resource Management |
| |
| From: | | Steve Rockarts |
We are looking to start using the Priority Scheduler to help us out with resource management. Hoping you all can add some of your
experience(s) with this product.
The Best Practices Doc recommends moving all non-system session and work to a separate resource partition. This is phase 1 of our plan.
I have a couple of related questions:
1) Based on just moving all non-system sessions to RP1 and going with all defaults (RP1 = none, default, M1, AG 41) does
anyone have a recommendation on the weightings? - Our plan was 100 (RP0) 75 (RP1).
2) With such a high weighting on each (RP0 and 1), can you migrate your clients and batch sessions in phases? - based on the
fact that only "active" sessions are considered and the high weighting on each of the RP's; or, should it be a "big bang" type move - any of
your experiences would be helpful.
3) We are planning to create the remaining 4 RP's and only use the first two (initially) - do I need to create the system
Performance Groups? or, are they inherently created by the system?
| 
