data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 @ 20:05:53 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Maximum number of foreign key in a table in Teradata? |
|
From: | | frank.c.martinez |
If you put on 32 secondaries, I can guarantee that the optimizer will never use some, and will probably never use most of them. I think if you
ran a poll of the people on this list, you'd find not a lot of use of secondary indices. Somebody asked about Teradata architecture, and one of
the aspects of that is, a secondary index won't be used if more than a certain amount of a particular table (is it 10% or 20%?) of the table is
used. Because a full table scan is faster (think about that for a minute). And with PPI on a larger table, you can do a full scan of a small
partition in a large table much quicklier.
iv
PS: And Dieter, you never weighed in on that skewing thing. You must have better distribution queries than me. Ok, than I.
| |