|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 @ 12:56:49 GMT
<-- Anonymously Posted: Monday, June 20, 2005 08:52 --> We are in the process of modifying Priority Scheduler by adding 3 new Resource Partitions and 7 new Performance Groups, in addition to the 4 Performance Groups already in in Default. Some want to run a "heart-beat" query in each of the 11 Performance Groups every 15 to 30 minutes or so around the clock. This would produce a lot of data over time. What useful information would this produce? How would the results be analyzed if you did not know the number, nature and in what Performance Group other queries were running. Would one hear-beat query running in the same Performance Group all the day be sufficient? Is there a better approach? Someone has suggested that a presentation at Partners last Fall suggested this multi-heart-beat query approach. If so, do you have any further information on the rationale behind it/ analyses to be done/ etc. Thanks very much
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||