|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 @ 22:16:59 GMT
Hi All: Life is really worth living when you learn something new! I stand corrected and this was a great thread because I had been told that SPOOL would not support secondary index definitions. Either this was true and has changed, or is was never true. I created a volatile table with a USI and sure enough, the EXPLAIN comes back as a two-AMP operation. So, a USI can be a good thing to use with a volatile table as long as you have sufficient SPOOL to contain both the base rows and the index rows. With that being said, one posting to this thread indicated that statistics could not be collected. Assuming that this is a true statement, that would seem to indicate little reason to create a NUSI definition for a volatile table because I have also been told that the optimizer will not use a NUSI without statistics and that is my experience even with real tables. Thanks for teaching an Old Dog a new trick - I love it. Best regards, Michael Larkins
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||