|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 @ 08:24:13 GMT
Hello, I don't think this has anything to do with join indexes being fundamentally different to other indexes. We've had the 2641-error in the following situation Job 1 created a NUSI on table A. During this process, Job 2 wanted to read table A. We did not want to schedule Job 2 after Job 1 for good reasons, so some times Job 2 had to wait for read-lock on table A. When Job 1 finished, Job 2 got a 2641 error "Table A was restructured. Resubmit". In BTEQ Job 2 can automatically resubmit the request if RETRY is ON (which I believe is the default for BTEQ). This is accomplished by a ".SET ERRORLEVEL (2641) SEVERITY 0" command. So maybe this is also happening to you - when creating the join index, or maybe some of the processes runs a little bit slower due to the (extra) join index, and therefore you get into this locking situation. Ole Dunweber
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||