data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 @ 17:08:49 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Multiset UV table |
|
From: | | Frank C. Martinez IV |
I have noticed that if you keep a UV (Unique Violation) table (which contains rows that violated unique primary index constraints or rows that
are exact duplicates of another if it's a SET table, not MULTISET) around for a while, they do begin to smell somewhat. They are usually way
beyond musty, much more than "Mustiest". As in Hamlet, there's something rotten in Denmark (or in the incoming data).
iv
| |