Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 @ 10:49:45 GMT
| Subj: | | Re: Stored Procedures - Pros & Cons |
| |
| From: | | Victor Sokovin |
Christian,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 03:01:58 +0100, Christian Schiefer wrote:
| | The thing in this case was performance - so we had to go for a PI-access. We build a table on a daily base ( fair enough for routing ) and
then find the customer via the SP ( dialed digits " or less" because of extensions ... ). | |
| | Its better to go for a couple of PI-access queries instead of one "where .. like %" | |
| | There have been up to 30.000 requests(calls)/day on a ( 2-node 48xx ) and we are far off of measuering any performance issues because of
that application. | |
Did you have a chance to compare performance of SP against macros in your setup? If so, what was the main reason to go for SP?
The reason I am asking is that when I was reading your posting I recalled Carrie Ballinger's benchmarking report in
www.teradataforum.com/teradata/20031110_210348.htm .
That thread might still be useful for those of us who evaluate options regarding SP and macros.
Regards,
Victor
| 
