Archives of the TeradataForum

Message Posted: Mon, 20 May 2002 @ 12:36:02 GMT

	<Prev	Next>		<<First	<Prev	Next>	Last>>

Dennis's recommendations are good, but I would hesitate to use 1700 as the base year for this reason:

$ cal 9 1752
   September 1752
 S  M Tu  W Th  F  S
       1  2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Using 1700 as a base might work, but I would test this thoroughly.

	<Prev	Next>		<<First	<Prev	Next>	Last>>