data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 @ 15:44:43 GMT
Subj: | | Re: On Join Index Creation |
|
From: | | Geoffrey Rommel |
| To avoid the ambiguity problem the alias works fine, but the question is why should there be an ambiguity when i have qualified the
columns to their respective tables - as "t1.a","t2.a","t1.b","t2.b"? | |
Because the join index is also treated as a "table" and therefore must have distinct column names. You are, in effect, trying to
create a table with columns named AA, B, B, and A.
| |