Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 @ 15:28:00 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Priority Scheduler Problem - Help |
|
From: | | Fred W Pluebell |
Known input edit bug fixed in later releases. Workaround is to specify a large number instead of zero for the last milestone limit.
schmon -p ACE_M 1 2 R 9600 6 32767 5
You do realize that 9600 is a fairly large limit? For type R, milestones are expressed in accumulated session CPU seconds PER NODE. On a
4-way SMP node that equates to at least 40 minutes elapsed even if there is nothing else in the system consuming CPU time.
|