data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 29 Oct 2015 @ 00:37:31 GMT
Subj: | | Re: SET vs MULTISET tables with UPI/USI |
|
From: | | Pluebell, Fred |
The duplicate row checking is still done, but with a UPI you only have to check at most one row so the overhead is tiny. With NUPI, the
overhead can be substantial even with a USI.
If you have a SET table with a UPI or USI, then multiple-row operations (e.g. INSERT SELECT or MERGE) will quietly eliminate duplicate rows ,
whereas with MULTISET table and UPI or USI, the duplicate key check will cause the operation to fail. For single-row operations (e.g. INSERT
VALUES), SET/MULTISET both give duplicate key error.
| |