data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 @ 09:27:00 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Minimal Stats Sampling and a well-informed |
|
From: | | Geoffrey Rommel |
| The number of distinct values will end up being extrapolated upwards, depending on the percentage of rows sampled. If 2% of the rows were
sampled, then you could expect to see about 50 times more distinct values in the produced estimate.... | |
Carrie, this seems odd to me. Two percent is a large sample -- far more than is needed for a 99% confidence level. Why doesn't the sampler
simply accept what it finds? Is it because of a fear that the sample isn't "truly random"?
| |