|  |  | Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 @ 09:27:00 GMT
 
 
  
| Subj: |  | Re: Minimal Stats Sampling and a well-informed |  |  |  | From: |  | Geoffrey Rommel |  
 |  | The number of distinct values will end up being extrapolated upwards, depending on the percentage of rows sampled.   If 2% of the rows were
sampled, then you could expect to see about 50 times more distinct values in the produced estimate.... |  | 
 
 
 Carrie, this seems odd to me. Two percent is a large sample -- far more than is needed for a 99% confidence level. Why doesn't the sampler
simply accept what it finds? Is it because of a fear that the sample isn't "truly random"? 
 
 |  |