 |
 |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 @ 19:45:16 GMT
| Subj: | | The IBM IIW data model implemented on Teradata? |
| |
| From: | | DOWNEYJ |
From the thread 'Merging large volumes of data into large history tables'
Dan Linstedt wrote:
| | No worries. I've been in the industry a long time (15+ years), no offense taken, and in fact - you can google me if you wish to find me in
many different places. As far as technical and business sides, I cross both. I grew up as an assembly level programmer, and have since migrated
to systems architecture and design - specialized in VLDB/VLDW (terabytes to petabyte sized systems). I've been working with the Teradata platform
for over 8 years now, and have been trained in the Teradata Factory Class, so I am familiar with the ins' and outs' (most of them). | |
| | Anyhow, I really like the exchanges, and in particular - with regards to partitioning, large data sets, and performance. This is what I
live for. I've been teaching performance and tuning for all kinds of systems for the past 8 years. | |
| | You can find me teaching a Governance & SEI/CMMI class at Teradata Partners(although I don't know if I've been accepted yet this
year). | |
| | Teradata has some unique propositions for ETL/ELT, performance, near-linear scalability, fail-over, and of course data mining embedded into
the SQL layers. It's high powered systems lead the pack when configured properly. | |
Dan,
Are you (or anyone else) familiar with the IBM IIW data model and if/how it has been implemented on Teradata? We would be interested in
speaking with anyone who has hands on experience with this.
Thanks
Jim
| |
