|
Archives of the TeradataForumMessage Posted: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 @ 17:55:58 GMT
I completely agree with what Harold and Frank.C.Martinez have said about using the 'times' as comparitive numbers, however I would add one additional factor. In my opinion you also need to consider the rough accuracy of the row estimates (where they're shown - and they're not always shown). My standard line when I'm teaching about Explains is: Use the times as comparative ** providing that ** the row estimates are in the correct order of magnitude. Most people can make a reasonable guess-estimate as to how many rows meet some selection criteria, particularly when dealing with the larger tables. Cheers, Dave Ward Analytics Ltd: Information in motion ( www.ward-analytics.com )
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||