data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 @ 11:42:20 GMT
Subj: | | Re: History treatment Using Upsert Logic |
|
From: | | Victor Sokovin |
| Is there a way in the Multiload Upsert operation that if a record is marked for update, that particular record should be closed (basically
update the end_Date) and the corresponding update row to be inserted as a new record. | |
Of course, not. ML is a generic tool, it should not be overloaded with application specific details.
The logic you are looking for is usually implemented on the ETL layer, of which ML might only be a small part.
Regards,
Victor
| |