data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 @ 09:34:57 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Design Considerations for FS-LDM/3NF model |
|
From: | | Agarwal, Rishi |
Thanks a lot Jonathan !!! This would really help.
We have kept PDM in 3NF form only. And we are using SGK for tables like Party, Address and Product but tables like Aggrement & Event are
uniquely identified via concatenation of source fields. Now, if we create UPI on PK columns, distribution will be good but did I would like to
know if you found any performance impact while handling the tables like Account-Party, Account-Event because of UPI created on PK columns.
Thanks
Rishi
| |