data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 @ 09:16:57 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Problem with PPI Table Creation? |
|
From: | | Victor Sokovin |
| Therefore, it would seem to follow that duplicate checking could be a much more monumental task than it is without PPI and we know how bad
it can be today. | |
True. However, the task of, say, duplicate checking in SET tables would appear to be even more monumental, wouldn't it? But they seem to allow
it. I guess it has a higher priority than the one we are discussing, and, moreover, there are workarounds available, like USIs.
Regards,
Victor
| |