Home Page for the TeradataForum

Archives of the TeradataForum

Message Posted: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 @ 17:36:18 GMT

  <Prev Next>   <<First <Prev

Subj:   Re: Why UPI on DBC.Acctg?
From:   ulrich arndt


thanks for the explanation.

I now understand why Teradata can handle the table with the UPI.

The 'create table as' was an example for showing that there is a break in the TD implementation of this table.

So - from an academic point of view - why not adding the VPROC column to the PI? In this case formal design and physical Teradata implementation would fit at least better...

But I am realistic and am not hoping that the PI will be changed ever


  <Prev Next>   <<First <Prev
  Top Home Privacy Feedback  
Copyright for the TeradataForum (TDATA-L), Manta BlueSky    
Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved    
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2023