data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 @ 10:53:33 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Derived Tables in V2R5 |
|
From: | | Dieter Noeth |
Howard Bradley wrote:
| The GSC have said that Derived tables are now treated in the same way as VIEWS (sorry if I have over simplified this) and therefore
it is working as designed. | |
Maybe it's working as designed, but *not* working according to SQL:1999 or SQL92. A Derived Table or View must *behave* as if it
was materialized, the optimizer is trying to optimize too much, so it's a bug ;-)
Dieter
| |