Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 @ 22:18:15 GMT
I had a user (Payroll) that ran into Queryman anomoly, and I opened an incident on the corruption issue. When I found out about the 16 digit accuracy checkbox in newer versions of Queryman, I closed the original incident, and opened a new incident (RECAQ74D5) get the refault setting for the checkbox changed (i.e. the default should be accurate display). This lead to the following RFC DR:
DR66111 Querryman version 6 - default option shows corrupted data.
Which was rejected because NCR felt that the default covered the more common usages of the product. Feel free disagree with their decision.
/dave "hates data corrup!@#$" hough
|Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved|
|Last Modified: 28 Jun 2020|