data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/835f0/835f0183d68360e38201c0eea348393d05ddc0cf" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedd4/fedd46b5eddfc5d215c8fcb543c21c47cbcce0b1" alt="" |
Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 @ 09:16:29 GMT
Subj: | | Re: Placement of VARCHAR and COMPRESSed Columns In A Row |
|
From: | | Dave Sedgwick |
David,
We have compress on many of our fact columns, for example on 40 columns of our 56 column main order table. This came out of experiments
for performance on a very large but sparsley populated main fact table used for a Business Objects development. Whilst there is a minor
overhead to populate the table, we found a big improvement in space saving and also in query performance. I understand that this is because
more data is brought into each (64k?) read block as the compressed values are much smaller. This only works if you have a value that is
very common in the column in question. In our case as it is a sparsley populated dimension table where zero is very common.
Dave
| |