Archives of the TeradataForum
Message Posted: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 @ 15:48:41 GMT
It might be worth experimenting with PI structures on both tables. There was a discussion recently on AMP-local and cross-AMP aggregation processes which might be relevant for this example. The thread should be in the May archives, if memory serves.
SIs on DateID might be beneficial for that particular query but you should not forget that they will not improve performance of your DML and will require extra space and administration, including collection of statistics etc.
If you are sure that the logic of the application eliminates duplicates under all circumstances you can define BCWK_SPEND as MULTISET. That will improve the insert part of the query.
Some applications might consider using JI with or instead of such queries.
As a side remark I'd mention that using DATE as a table name might create some problems because DATE is a reserved word in TD but this has nothing to do with performance.
|Copyright 2016 - All Rights Reserved|
|Last Modified: 27 Dec 2016|